Sunday, September 21, 2008

Feed up with the news medias bias

Dear Editorial Team at RealClearPolitics;

Coverage of the news, which is how history will be written, has gotten out of hand. Where are the true journalists? In junior high school, during the 60’s, we were taught about muckraking and yellow journalism. I had thought they were a thing of the past. I was wrong. Not only are they still with us, but they are more sophisticated and dirtier than ever before. It seems like there are only a few RealTrueJournalist any more; the rest of those who claim to be reporting the news have become talking heads. Did you catch the play on “RealClearPolitics”, where both sides are at least presented? However, even with RCP the readership is still left to ferret out the truth.

Perhaps each reporter should be required to identify their political affiliation and how they voted in the last ten years. Oh, we can’t ask that of a reporter, it might violate some of their privileges. (They call them rights and they say, “Trust us we are non-bias, we can regulate our selves”; but they have sadly abused their positions to the point that few in the public believe most of them. They see them for what they are. Besides they never allow any other agency the courtesy of policing themselves; something to do with a fox in the hen house, or so they say.

So much for the berating and belittling (which is probably the wrong approach) and is of little value unless a solution is proposed? While we must rely on the press to try to keep each other in check; each member should be required to take an oath similar to the Hippocratic Oath doctors take. I do not pretend to know exactly what it should say. I will suggest that everyone who reports the news should strive to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Where have I heard that before? The oath should be taken under the penalty of self banishment by the offending individual if they fail to uphold the strictest of standards. Well, maybe, their colleagues might have to help them find other employment and show them the way to the door.

In reality each reporter and journalist for any form of the news vehicle is writing history and should be held to the standards of Lucian, A.D.120-200. If you were to substitute the word “news person, reporter, journalist for historian”, his edict might well become our modern oath or standard for those we trust to deliver us the news.

“The historian should be fearless and incorruptible; a man of independence, loving frankness and truth; one who, as the poet says, calls a fig a fig and a spade a spade. He should yield to neither hatred nor affection, nor should he be unsparing and unpitying. He should be neither shy nor deprecating, but an impartial judge, giving each side all it deserves but no more. He should know in his writing no country and no city; he should bow to no authority and acknowledge no king. He should never consider what this or that man will think, but should state the facts as they really occurred.”

A motto for the news media, a badge to wear, a philosophy; that until the various news outlets require these types of standards of their employees, top to bottom, the public’s right to know will be the casualty, hidden beneath the bias and the lies of those who promise to serve with truth and honesty, but would rather consciously or subconsciously to promote a particular point of view they hold dear..

Let it be written, let it be said, and please let it be so; that we can have a free and fair press. Where have I heard something like this before?

Some thoughts for a national discussion; do you have any suggestions on how to start the ball rolling?

Thanks for the time you took to read this essay. I assume if you are reading the thank you read it all.
Ted Boyett, tired reader (TBoy@acgmail.gr), 21.09.2008

I am open to any of your comments. I fell confident nothing will become of this submission due to the fraternity protecting its own. But it does me good to get type of thing off my chest (vent)& out of my mind. Oh, you have to have a mind before you can purge it. As Josh says, "have an excellent day."

6 comments:

LaLee said...

Did you write that essay? or are you merely the reader... you signed it tired reader... It is very well written... very well. I am thoroughly impressed with your writing. This is an B plus paper that could easily be an A plus with a bit of tightening up. I'm sure Jesse and I would help... if it is yours. There is a weekly US magazine where readers give their one page opinions. This is worth submitting and would give you a one page forum... a national readership... You are one talented guy... Love

jimpurdy1943@yahoo.com said...

Sorry, but I disagree completely. The problem is not biased journalism. It's not even dumbed-down journalism. The problem is dumbed-down citizens who get their "news" from ignorant spam emails ("Obama is a Muslim" nonsense), and from entertainers posing as journalists (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and the like). Believe it or not, there are lots of excellent news sources out there, but you have to be willing to do more than look at a 3-second sound bite on Faux News. It's not that hard to search for the full transcript or video of a politician's speech, and you'll discover that a speech by McCain, Obama, Biden or Palin didn't resemble the TV sound bite or DrudgeReport headline at all. Just make a little effort at searching, and you'll find more and better information than ever before in human history.

I'm a former journalist. Just keep in mind that news is a business, and it has to sell a product that people want. That's why we get celeb news all the time, and no discussion in depth about serious global issues.

Just make the effort to do some homework. The news is out there.

If you want to improve the news, then improve the news consumers. Support better public schools.

Josh & Teddie said...

First off, Dad who is Jim?

Secondly I agree wholeheartedly with your essay. I do also believe that support of better schools woiuld improve journalism.... HOwever we need the journalists now to get in line. I think you should submit this to I don't know, a magazine for the readers page. Good luck! We love you and HAVE AN EXCELLENT DAY!

Waterspout said...

Jim, as I said the fraternity closing ranks. I do spend the time to look and have found at least one good site on line. But I have found no major network without a major bias. There are a few good reporters. But the most of them have shown their bias too frequently. Maybe you should come out of retirement and help out. You are right the general public needs to look at more than the sound bite; but I expect the major news outlets to do more that the general public and do a better job out reporting to the mass, who have many other things on their plates. The public trust has been betrayed for a few pieces of silver.

Sorry I am so exercise. Living in Greece for the last few years with only two major US news outlets available on a regular bases over here and a few weeks of viewing/reading when I'm State side may have slated my views.

Jim, I do not have the vested interest in upholding the honor of the media that you do and remember as a journalist you have been trained in that craft, most individuals or trained in something else and relay on your brethern to be totaly honest and truthful doing their investigative work for them Just they might hope an automachanic takes care of the detailed parts of their car upkeep after all they can do of keeping air in the tires, oil in the engine, and gass in the tank.

Eva's Mom said...

Oh, come on. TV shows exist because of corporate sponsors, ie, the people who buy air time for their commercials. Companies purchase advertising slots based on the the number and demographics of the viewers. If the TV shows don't attract viewers, the corporations won't buy advertising slots and the TV show will go off the air. All of those people with the Nielson ratings boxes sitting on top of their televisions drive the media bias. The TV news and opinion producers simply hire the folks who attract viewers--and you expect this to result in "unbiased reporting." Good luck!

Now, would you like to discuss how the free market does with other public interests? Hmmmm.... Maybe we could start with health care or, oh, oh, I've got it, energy! No, no, wait...we should really talk about school vouchers because the market economy is such a GREAT driver of the public good.

{In case you couldn't tell, YES! I was being sarcastic. The apple don't fall far from the tree.}

Waterspout said...

Yes, let's discuss them all. It's more fun that way. And it gives us a chance to hone our writting skills; assuming we have any.